<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft has released tools that should make it much easier for users to share and save text-based files</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mihirshah.wordpress.com/2007/02/03/microsoft-has-released-tools-that-should-make-it-much-easier-for-users-to-share-and-save-text-based-files/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mihirshah.wordpress.com/2007/02/03/microsoft-has-released-tools-that-should-make-it-much-easier-for-users-to-share-and-save-text-based-files/</link>
	<description>Njoy Every moment...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 04:59:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tsolum</title>
		<link>http://mihirshah.wordpress.com/2007/02/03/microsoft-has-released-tools-that-should-make-it-much-easier-for-users-to-share-and-save-text-based-files/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>tsolum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 08:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mihirshah.wordpress.com/2007/02/03/microsoft-has-released-tools-that-should-make-it-much-easier-for-users-to-share-and-save-text-based-files/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Actually if Microsoft would switch to the ODF then this tool would not be needed. As usual though Microsoft insists on its own proprietary format so that it ties users to Microsoft. If MS used ODF then the users would have choice of what software the user could use, instead of something MS made. ODF is not proprietary software, it is open source, meaning free, you can look at the source code, change it, improve it, sell it, just plain use it. You cannot do that with proprietary software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually if Microsoft would switch to the ODF then this tool would not be needed. As usual though Microsoft insists on its own proprietary format so that it ties users to Microsoft. If MS used ODF then the users would have choice of what software the user could use, instead of something MS made. ODF is not proprietary software, it is open source, meaning free, you can look at the source code, change it, improve it, sell it, just plain use it. You cannot do that with proprietary software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
